• YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    Where I live in Scotland about 73% of electricity generated come from renewables (mostly wind and hydro). I’m hugely in favour of this, but the bills keep rising.

    I firmly believe the utility companies should be nationalised. I’m not against capitalism per se, but the current setup is a racket.

    • Prior_Industry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah honestly even if we were at 100% renewables, the price has been set and people are used to it now. No company is going to voluntarily start discounting unless more competition enters the market to start a price war. So far most of the energy “competition” has gone bust.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Will they really though?

    Have you looked at your power bill and seen how much of the bill is not power consumption?

    We have also seen multiple times where the wholesale price of electricity is below zero yet consumers are still paying for power during those times.

  • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Solar is so cheap now, that some people can just build their own solar and battery setup themselves.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes, but at scale it is significantly cheaper to build larger and distribute it. It also means people don’t have to over invest in their own set up just to cover their peak usage. There is also a large amount of up front capital required to build with usually years before you get back what was invested. Its also almost impossible for renters or apartment buildings to do it themselves.

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes I know all of that, I’m saying that solar is so much cheaper than coal power that even private individuals can buy it, so we shouldn’t be wasting money on new coal plants or gas plants.

        • trongod_requiem0432@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Same for nuclear. U.S.-Americans are brainwashed on this topic.

          First, they pay with their tax dollars for the subsidies that the private for-profit companies use to build the nuclear reactors. After that, they pay again, because the private company charges them extra on the electricity bill for the electricity generated by the very same nuclear reactor so that they can make even more profit.

          It’s so stupid and they’re brainwashed to defend it to the teeth. They also always try to deflect from the fact that renewables are cheaper than nuclear and can be owned by them instead of a for-profit company, by pretending that everyone who opposes nuclear energy must be in favour of coal and gas. It’s mind boggling to watch.

          • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Nuclear power is really cool, but my biggest problem with building new reactors isn’t even the money issues you pointed out, it’s the fact that I live in the US and I don’t trust any regulatory agency to build a new nuclear power plant correctly/safely.

            Solar panels and wind turbines are monumentally cheaper AND they don’t potentially cause ten thousand year contamination problems.

            • trongod_requiem0432@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Nuclear power is really cool Why though? It’s insanely inefficient in terms of costs and really, really dangerous if something goes seriously wrong.

              If you install a solar panels with a regulator, it’s running in less than 2 weeks and goes for decades with very little maintenance that almost every idiot can do. Plus, you don’t have to pay for a company’s profit while getting that energy. Now THAT is cool in my opinion.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Or the quicker way: the government nationalises all power companies, and sold electricity for cheap… Because it’s necessary… For society…

  • minorkeys@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Would also be cheaper if the government owned the energy infrastructure and ran at cost.

  • switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yes but how would the fascists get kickbacks and bribes then? That’s a big chunk of their income. Won’t someone think of the oligarchy???

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    New data centers should have to pay on a sliding scale based on energy availability in the local grid. And if they want to build out generation it should be solar and wind only.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    When the price goes up it’s because the renewables don’t produce power when there is no wind and sun (which pretty much sums up January here). Building more of something that does not produce power is not going to help with the price shocks.

    We need to figure out grid scale storage, fusion or build nuclear power to get rid of fossil fuels. Until then utility bills will be occasionally more shocking than jamming a fork in the outlet.

  • carrylex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Fun Fact: Doesn’t really work in Winter.

    Source: EU countries that don’t have a ton of cheap gas, flowing water or nuclear power and unlimited storage.

  • maplesaga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Maybe Nuclear, given it can actually support the base load power, except they need to fully deregulate it first so Nimbys and lawsuits balloon the cost. It shouldnt cost more nowadays in inflation adjusted terms than France building them in the 70s.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Your talking points are ten years out of date. The cheapest form of baseload power now is batteries plus solar. For seasonal variations? Nuclear is so expensive that it’s far cheaper to just build enough to meet your winter electricity demand and have abundant power the rest of the year.

      Fission is a dead end technology that people mostly support now so they can feel a sense of contrarian intellectual superiority. It’s all just vibes at this point.

      • maplesaga@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Do you have an example of a city that runs on renewables with battery storage with no duplicate backup base load generator?

        As far as I was aware there were none, as it is non-feasible outside of areas with hydro dams for power storage.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Do you have an example of a city that runs on renewables with battery storage with no duplicate backup base load generator?

          Thankfully cities don’t build isolated power grids.

  • Creegz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Remember how now that countries have stopped recognizing US medial science we see cures for cancer coming out of the woodwork? Yeah…

      • Creegz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Generally speaking medical research in the US has been scrutinized due to the incredibly profitable privatized nature of it, so much so that people believe solutions are actively suppressed in favor of more expensive options. In the last few weeks after the US left the WHO a whole bunch of cancer cures started coming up. While probably a coincidence, after the last few months of conspiracy theorists being proven at least to some degree right it’s getting hard to ignore that this may not be a coincidence.