• Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    This has nothing to do with quality of enjoyment but access to it.

    Requirements are not marketing. They are mechanical limitations specified by the developers. That’s the difference between “Minimum” and “Recommended”. We are talking about the minimum requirements here.

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Maybe I wasn’t clear, but my point was these requirements are indeed driven by the studios and the GPU makers.

      These are marketing decisions, because the day it stops (imagine studio claiming “we’re good enough, no more need to improve graphics!” then GPU last 10 years or more before needing replacement (I write a conservative 10, as they are heavily stressed while in use, but a computer can last longer than that).

      Similarly, if graphics stop improving, studios will have a much harder time coming up with new games players want to buy. They will need to actually innovate in games mechanisms or find other added value features, or accept that the market will significantly decrease as new shiny graphics on the same game will no longer work.

      So game advertisements are all about blasting you with spectacular graphics and animations.