Copy image? Nope, here’s the link instead.

    • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If we’re talking in terms of vodeo containers (or codecs), then why are we talking about it on a post about webp?

      Unless you consider webp to be a video container because it does support animated pictures, but, again, it also supports transparency.

      Also, HEVC is not a video (/media) container, it’s a codec.

      • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        As a lay person, codecs and containers are not visible to me, but the file extension is.

        So .webm would be relevant in a post about .webp, because they are only one letter different.

        • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          What are we even talking about?

          fork:

          • implied that webp doesn’t support transparency (false);
          • got called out;
          • brought up the topic of video containers (incorrectly) for some reason;
          • got called out again.

          The fact that webm is relevant here is undisputed (or so I believe)