Copy image? Nope, here’s the link instead.

      • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        If we’re talking in terms of vodeo containers (or codecs), then why are we talking about it on a post about webp?

        Unless you consider webp to be a video container because it does support animated pictures, but, again, it also supports transparency.

        Also, HEVC is not a video (/media) container, it’s a codec.

        • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          As a lay person, codecs and containers are not visible to me, but the file extension is.

          So .webm would be relevant in a post about .webp, because they are only one letter different.

          • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            What are we even talking about?

            fork:

            • implied that webp doesn’t support transparency (false);
            • got called out;
            • brought up the topic of video containers (incorrectly) for some reason;
            • got called out again.

            The fact that webm is relevant here is undisputed (or so I believe)