Copy image? Nope, here’s the link instead.

        • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          If we’re talking in terms of vodeo containers (or codecs), then why are we talking about it on a post about webp?

          Unless you consider webp to be a video container because it does support animated pictures, but, again, it also supports transparency.

          Also, HEVC is not a video (/media) container, it’s a codec.

          • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            As a lay person, codecs and containers are not visible to me, but the file extension is.

            So .webm would be relevant in a post about .webp, because they are only one letter different.

            • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              What are we even talking about?

              fork:

              • implied that webp doesn’t support transparency (false);
              • got called out;
              • brought up the topic of video containers (incorrectly) for some reason;
              • got called out again.

              The fact that webm is relevant here is undisputed (or so I believe)