Bin laden and its not close
Western educated man who is pissed off at the US for abandoning his political ascension? Slightly better than a meth addicted turboracist, a crazy murderer, and a child molester. I doubt bin Laden is going to be able to do much opinion changing in a single evening and I doubt that he’d outright kill or molest them.
Bin Laden fathered 24 children, the first of which was with his first cousin when she was 16 and he was 17. They went on to have ten more children. The other 13 were spread amongst five other wives. They also found several beheading videos on his computer. He also believed muslims should kill any US civilians they find until the US withdraws support for Israel.
I think definitely killing and maybe molestation would be on the table.
He was a wealthy politician first, revolutionary like fifth. Shit, you’re right, molestation is on the table.
Thankfully I’m not an American, so think my theoretical family would be more likely okay with him than the others.
deleted by creator
Not even remotely close. I saw him first and before seeing the rest of the faces I already knew that this was an usian thing so he was going to be “a major evil”.
Fact is, aside religion, we’d have a lot in common, including hating the US so, if any, it would give for an interesting evening for my kids and a more interesting post-evening chat with him.
The other 3, in my eyes, are way, waaaaaaaaaaaaaay worse.
The man had multiple wives and multiple kids. All of which where taken care of financially- so ya seconded
Bin Laden could be trusted because from what I know he never purposely wanted kids targeted. One murdered several children, one murdered too many to count in concentration camps as well as ordering soldiers to do it because he didn’t see them as human. The last one was a sex pest and I wouldn’t trust kids with.
Bin laden, of course! I heard he is the bomb.
Bin Laden would fuck then but at least he’d marry them first.
Bin Laden loved his kids. Part of the reason he moved to that compound in Pakistan was because he wanted his kids to have a semblance of a normal life. He’s discuss politics with is Eldest daughters. When he was captured he was found asleep with his youngest son.
You must not know very much about Bin Laden. Give his Wikipedia articles a quick skim. Your kids wouldn’t survive the night. If they survive an hour, it’s because they decided to kill them slowly.
I just read every section that sounded relevant and he sounds like a great guy besides the religious fundamentalism. Wrote poetry, took his kids on picnics, encouraged the american public to work with Obama on stopping climate change…
Yeah… but he supported Arsenal when he was in England, went to their old stadium for games - some people will never be able to forgive that.
Osama, easy. He’s a family man and would show absolute respect and kindness towards the child as is the custom of his religion and his culture.
He has nothing against children and has a big household with other kids mine can play with.
My child will also be damn safe there and get great food.
Such an easy contest.
But would they be safe from US bombs?
I mean they were for like 40 years and in the end they got snitched out and took out by a seal team so, probably.
US bombs are more calibrated to hit weddings.
Hitler liked Children and Dogs, so “Say Hello to Mr. Adolf, kids!”
deleted by creator
TIL that Hitler isn’t the “Worst” option for everything lol
Depends on how white you are I guess.
Osama for sure.
I know for a fact Bin Laden had games and the movie Cars on his computer. Safest bet.
Ugh he’s an arsenal fan.
Not in my house!
Did you see that ludicrous display last night‽
What was Wenger thinking, sending Walcott on that early?
The trouble with arsenal is they just like to walk it in.
No lol I just know they have been getting a bunch of hate recently. Were they bad?
Pretty sure I remember seeing he had a bunch of Naruto fansubs on his computer, too. He could even watch your weird kid and keep them entertained for the night.
I think im going bin laden
I don’t know who top left is, but I reckon Bin Laden’s the safe bet here
deleted by creator
As a childless adult that’s a fucking crazy thing to say for so many reasons.
I can appreciate a good dark joke, but generally it needs a humourous component beyond “it’s funny because it’s dark”, otherwise it’s just lame.
Top left: Lindsay Clancy - Apparently strangled her 3 kids, there is an ongoing process in the US right now
Top right: Osama Bin Laden - Former boss of the Taliban in Afghanistan and responsible for 9/11
Bottom left: Adolf Hitler - Leader of the German NSDAP and responsible for the Holocaust and WW2
Bottom right: Sean Combs aka P. Diddy - US musician, multiple cases of sexual violence and rape, and proliferation of prostitution
There is no question that she strangled them. The court is trying to determine whether she was sufficiently sane at the time to be held culpable.
Not according to one of the jurors:
“At the end of the day, there was so much doubt,” the woman said. “The prosecution didn’t have a figurative smoking gun. There was not a single moment throughout the presentation of that case where you could say ‘Yup, 100% I’m certain she did it’ or that she didn’t do it. There was too much gray area.”
https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/lindsay-clancy-juror-interview/
Couple that with the the sketchy findings about the husband’s actions and whereabouts, there is indeed question and reasonable doubt.
Thanks ChatGPT!
This is a pretty bold take from you. I don’t need GenAI to know who Hitler and Bin Laden are, but I googled the woman and P. Diddy as I am not from the US. I cannot tell if the news sites I googled are LLM generated though. I don’t want to be mean but maybe you should work on your trust issues.
Bin Laden unless you have twins.
Got me good. Thanks!
Osama bin Laden cuz I work with the CIA too.
My three kids are in their 20’s. Assuming there are no weapons involved, I’d say they’re safe with any of them.
Bin Laden, Hitler, and Combs would each have a rough night. Lindsay would probably be ok. If necessary, they could restrain her without injuring her.
Best send them to Bin Laden then because at least they wouldn’t be able to sit up all night raiding the bar.
Osama bin Laden loved his kids. He was hard on them, for sure, he was basically what you imagine when you think of a deep south US prepper survivalist - a bit eccentric and paranoid, but intelligent - he would be taking his kids on long hikes, teaching them how to sleep in the desert with only sand as a blanket, but he did it out of a deep desire to protect them and give them skills to survive.
deep south US prepper survivalist
intelligent
sorry, you lost me there
If they’re brown Muslim children
Tbh, I don’t know who the lady is
I think that’s the lady currently on trial for murdering her three kids.
Now I know, and
trial is over. she will likely have another trial. we won’t know until end of Sept when the next hearing for her case is set.
it’s possible a plea deal could be offered, but unlikely.
‘we have had the trial, yes. but what about the second one?’
I believe they’ve already said they aren’t retrying her case
Woman who recently had a mistrial go viral for being the latest influencer courtroom case. Similar to Depp v Heard. The woman’s name is Lindsay Clancy, I believe.
Notable things (viewing this through the lens of my wife who told me about this case):
- flimsy hard evidence against the mother
- mother allegedly tried to kill herself 3 different ways after snapping and allegedly killing her children while the husband was out of the house
- a lot of the evidence seemed to be hearsay from the husband
- children’s bodies were cremated by the father
- father is suspected of having a mistress because he moved on after this relatively quickly.
- jury trial ended in a hung jury, because 1 juror tried to reverse “12 Angry Men” it to get all other jurors to switch to a Guilty verdict.
- Clancy admitted to the murders initially
My unsolicited opinion is that she very likely did commit the crimes, but the State has insufficient evidence to convict due to the police’s negligence during their investigation.
Lindsay Clancy
She admitted to the murders, but is pleading insanity.
also this guy is spreading lies. the evidence is clear she did it, and she confessed. there was no despute as to her guilt in murdering her children.
the issue is whether she can be held criminally liable for first degree murder. if the charges had been manslaughter or something else, it would have been a slam dunk conviction. but due to her mental state at the time, it’s questionable if she was capable/committed first degree, or premeditated, murder.
but people don’t want to talk about the legal issues in the case… they just want to push the emotional bullshit that she was absolutely innocent, or absolutely guilty, and there can’t be anything in-between. and lots and lots of people like the db0 user commenting here are spreading lies about the case to push their political agenda.
to the point that many of the TikTok moms who support her innocence are working entirely outside of the factual evidence of the case. which is also more evidence of how social media itself is causing psychosis in many folks, as it’s well-documented already how social media amplifies delusional and paranoid thinking.
I was pretty explicit, I think she did it and the state lacks evidence to convict beyond the shadow of doubt.
Sorry if the db0 in my username added some political leaning to my above post. I was trying to be pretty by the numbers as best as I knew.
I didn’t even mention the fact that there’s been a giant push for people to claim that the father committed the murders. It’s pretty far out there for claims.
I know another comment some issues with the way her specific state handles insanity pleas. Of that, I am not too in the know about. So I didn’t mention it.
What the state lacks evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that she was sufficiently sane to be held criminally liable at the time of the murders in the state of Massachusetts. That last bit is important because it’s the only state where the prosecution has to prove sanity rather than the defense having to prove insanity.
Personally I suspect she’s not guilty by reason of insanity, but I’m not certain I’d feel that way beyond a reasonable doubt were I on the trial. And it seems a large portion of people are of the opinion neither side managed to clear the bar of reasonable doubt
I can switch to my Lemmy.World account if you prefer 😅
Fixed. Thanks! Problem with going off the cuff is I am terrible with names.
Get your wife out of her social media bubble.
Did I say something untrue? Nobody has corrected any bulleted things I stated. Just said I was spreading misinformation and never clarified.
How is the husband gtfoing indicative of a mistress or relevant to the question of whether the wife was sane at the time of the murders?
Having people close enough to take you in when your nutso spouse commits triple homicide is not a red flag or a cause to cast doubt on where the guilt lies
I don’t have a mistress but if my wife killed 3 family members, I’m sure I could find someone to give me a place to crash to get away
- Flimsy hard evidence against the mother
(your first bullet)
Is absolutely untrue and makes it sound like you are trying to cast doubt on the case in weird ways based on all your subsequent points.
This isn’t “Making of a Murder” , no matter how many podcasts you heard. Extremely clear cut case from an evidentiary perspective, so much so neither side argued the evidence AT ALL
The husband embezzled donations after skimping on the child’s gravestones.
He fucking set the whole thing up and is getting a free pass because this is what Americia stands for these days.
It’s scary that not all of the choices are the same level of risk.
